Friday 13 July 2007

Civilisation

Welcome back.

I'm about halfway through watching an outstanding BBC documentary series called Civilisation. It was written and narrated by Kenneth Clark, who, I recenetly found out, was the father of Alan Clark.

Clark is magnificent in the series. The cinematography itself would make this series worthwhile, but his narration is beyond praise. He is absolutely clear, always intelligent, and almost never patronising.

The series is also impressive for the coherence of the thoughts and arguments expressed in it. Some of his slightly more xenophobic comments may be offensive to those who are easily offended; but they should also serve to remind one that the ideas and the narrative are the result of a single man's thoughts. That alone is worth applauding in an era of collectively produced, almost corporate entertainment.

It is also astonishing that there are only two signs of age shown by this work, apart from the obvious signs of the times in background, such as cars. The first is the occasional comments, mentioned above, which do not conform to the bland opionlessness of modern art documentaries. Secondly, the complexity of the thoughts expressed is significantly greater than anything else I have ever seen on television. It is a reminder that television can be educational and intellectually stimulating without failing to be entertaining.

However, the greatest quality of this documentary is its intellectual honesty. The presenter motivates his series with questions, and proceeds to attempt to answer them. But he does so in a scupulously open and honest way. There is none of the disingenuity which makes so many television programs look patronising, or even like propoganda. Where the evidence supporting his point is ambiguous he lets us know, and then explains his opinions, rather than prsenting an unbalanced narrative.

So many articles are written, or documentaries made, by people whose minds are already made up. Their contributions to the public discourse are an attempt to sell their position, and they do so without any regard for this sort of intellectual honesty.

This quality has all but dissappeared today; from political discourse where all issues are reframed by each side in ridiculous black and white, downwards (or upwards, according to one's tastes) through so much of society. It reflects a mind-set which is truly rare even in academic circles. It shows a man who is prepared to make his arguments seem weaker, in order to make them more honest.

Of course, Kenneth Clark was an emminent and distinguished scholar at the time he made the series; and this quality may have been extremely rare at the time. So this quality may never have been widepread in mankind. Nonetheless, I was glad to have caught this glimpse of it.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Dear Monkey,

Well, here I am again. I hope I'm not intruding with too many comments. But your monkiness is just so captivating. I just want to say two things:

First (notice I didn't use the bizarre "firstly" so common in the UK), I really appreciate the BBC for its in-depth coverage of news compared to our nightly American half-hour treatment in which we find out almost nothing about the world in general.

Second, when I watch the BBC on television, my ears feel battered after a while by the incessant sonorous tones of BBC news reporters. Why do they always present their material in a style that sounds like they are reading a book? And why does the last word in every sentence they say always get the stress? This is just so hard to listen to.

I wish they would be forced to take courses in public speaking or, at least be forced to learn something from the conversational style of American newscasters.

Well, that's my rant for today.

--Jackrabbit